Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:51
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Walking This Many Steps Per Day Can Cut Your Risk Of Early Death - HuffPost
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
If you were president, how would you make America "great again?"
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
How did Nickelback gain a large fan base despite criticism of their music?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Illum autem fuga doloremque est quod delectus id.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Have you made a female relative or friend squirt?
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Crypto-crazy investors make South Korea the best-performing market in Asia - Financial Times
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.